Peace Talks Stagnate as New Leaders Consolidate Power
One year after parliament massacre, Armenia-Azerbaijan negotiations remain frozen as both countries focus on internal stability
One year after Armenia’s parliament massacre, peace negotiations over Nagorno-Karabakh remain effectively frozen as both countries’ new leaders prioritize internal consolidation over conflict resolution.
Changed Landscape
The October 1999 killings fundamentally altered:
- Leadership dynamics in both countries
- Domestic political priorities
- Risk tolerance for compromise
- Public mood regarding concessions
Armenia’s Paralysis
President Kocharyan’s position:
- Lost key political allies
- Legitimacy questioned
- Cannot risk bold moves
- Hardliners strengthened
New government:
- Lacks war veterans’ credibility
- Focused on stability
- Avoids controversial decisions
- Maintains status quo
Azerbaijan’s Transition
Meanwhile in Azerbaijan:
- Heydar Aliyev’s health declining
- Son Ilham being groomed
- Succession concerns paramount
- No appetite for risks
Diplomatic Theater
Minsk Group continues meetings:
- Regular co-chair visits
- Presidential encounters
- Working group sessions
- No substantive progress
Paris talks (January 2000):
- Kocharyan-Aliyev meeting
- Cordial but empty
- No new proposals
- Positions unchanged
Lost Momentum
Pre-massacre trajectory:
- Key West near-agreement
- Leaders building trust
- Creative solutions explored
- Public opinion shifting
Current reality:
- Zero-sum thinking returns
- Maximalist positions
- No political capital
- Fear dominates
Regional Implications
The stalemate affects:
- Economic development blocked
- Regional integration stalled
- Military buildup continuing
- Isolation deepening
Public Attitudes
In Armenia:
- Compromise equals betrayal
- Victory narrative stronger
- Trauma reinforces hardline
- Status quo acceptable
In Azerbaijan:
- Patience wearing thin
- Military solution discussed
- Oil revenues building
- Revanchism growing
International Fatigue
Mediators increasingly frustrated:
- Same proposals recycled
- No political will
- Other crises emerging
- Resources redirected
Frozen Conflict Emerges
Characteristics crystallizing:
- No war, no peace
- Positions entrenched
- Societies militarized
- Resolution distant
Warning Signs
- Arms race accelerating
- Incidents increasing
- Rhetoric hardening
- Next generation alienated
Looking Ahead
Without leadership change:
- Stalemate continues
- Risks accumulate
- Opportunities missed
- Future conflict likely
The parliament massacre’s shadow ensures that 2000 ends with the Karabakh conflict more frozen than ever, awaiting leaders willing to take risks for peace.