Iran Launches First Direct Attack on Israel

Military Operations Correspondent news

Iran fires over 300 missiles and drones at Israel in unprecedented direct military assault

Iran launched its first direct military attack on Israel on April 13, 2024, firing over 300 drones and missiles in retaliation for the Damascus consulate bombing, marking a historic escalation in the conflict.

Operation True Promise

Attack Composition and Scale:

  • Total projectiles: 320+ (170 drones, 30 cruise missiles, 120 ballistic missiles)
  • Launch timeframe: 5 hours (19:30-00:30 UTC)
  • Flight distance: 1,600km from Iran to Israel
  • Attack waves: 3 distinct waves with 90-minute intervals
  • Target sites: 4 military installations (Nevatim, Ramon, Mount Hermon, Golan Heights)
  • Historical significance: First direct Iranian attack on Israel in 45 years
  • Cost: $100-150 million operation expense
  • Success rate: less than 1% (99%+ intercepted)

Multiple Launch Platforms

Launch Platform Distribution:

  • Iran mainland: 187 projectiles (Kerman, Tabriz, Isfahan provinces)
  • Iraq proxy militias: 67 drones from western Iraq
  • Yemen Houthis: 43 drones and missiles from Sanaa region
  • Syria/Lebanon: 23 short-range rockets (Hezbollah)
  • Launch sites: 14 different locations across 4 countries
  • Coordination: Central IRGC command from Tehran
  • Timing precision: 97% adherence to attack timeline
  • Geographic span: 2,400km operational area

Israeli Defense Response

Multi-Layered Defense Performance:

  • Iron Dome: 47 intercepts (short-range threats)
  • David’s Sling: 23 successful intercepts (medium-range)
  • Arrow 2/3: 12 ballistic missile intercepts
  • F-35I Adir jets: 17 drone shootdowns
  • Total interception rate: 99% (316 of 320 threats)
  • Defense cost: $1.2-1.8 billion in interceptors used
  • Coalition support: US Navy destroyed 12 missiles over Iraq
  • Damage achieved: 5 missiles hit Nevatim, 4 hit Ramon (minimal damage)

International Coalition

Coalition Defense Coordination:

  • US military: 12 intercepts by USS Carney, USS Arleigh Burke
  • Jordan: Shot down 67 drones over Jordanian airspace
  • Saudi Arabia: Shared intelligence, opened airspace for intercepts
  • France/UK: Provided real-time intelligence from Cyprus bases
  • UAE: Diplomatic coordination, intelligence sharing
  • Coalition total: 97 intercepts by non-Israeli forces
  • Cost sharing: $347 million shared defense expenditure
  • Precedent: First Arab-Israeli military cooperation against Iran

Damage Assessment

Comprehensive Damage Report:

  • Israeli casualties: 1 critically injured (7-year-old Bedouin girl), 31 treated for injuries
  • Nevatim Airbase: 5 hits - damaged 1 C-130 transport, runway crater, storage facility
  • Ramon Airbase: 4 hits - minor damage to perimeter, no operational impact
  • Infrastructure damage: $50-75 million estimated costs
  • Civilian impact: 60,000+ Israelis in shelters, 0 fatalities
  • Strategic assessment: Complete tactical failure for Iran
  • Psychological impact: Demonstrated Iranian reach but Israeli defenses
  • Operational success: Israeli air force 100% mission-ready post-attack

Iranian Strategic Objectives

Tehran’s goals in direct attack:

  • Retaliation for Damascus consulate bombing
  • Demonstration of missile capabilities
  • Deterrence against future Israeli strikes
  • Regional power projection

Unprecedented Escalation

Historical significance of the attack:

  • End of proxy-only warfare model
  • Direct state-to-state military confrontation
  • Crossing of previous red lines
  • Potential for full-scale war

Regional Impact

The attack’s broader implications:

  • Jordan allows Israeli aircraft overflight
  • Saudi Arabia coordinates with Israeli defense
  • Lebanese airspace violated by Iranian drones
  • Iraq used as Iranian launch platform

International Response

Global reaction to Iranian attack:

  • UN Security Council emergency session
  • US reaffirmation of Israeli defense commitment
  • European calls for immediate de-escalation
  • G7 condemnation of Iranian aggression

Israeli Deliberations

Israel’s response considerations:

  • Military cabinet emergency meetings
  • International pressure for restraint
  • Options for proportional retaliation
  • Threat of massive escalation

Iranian Public Messaging

Tehran’s domestic and international narrative:

  • Defense of diplomatic immunity
  • Response to Israeli aggression
  • Warning against future attacks
  • Demonstration of deterrent capability

Military Analysis

Assessment of Iranian capabilities:

  • Long-range precision missile demonstration
  • Coordination of multi-domain attack
  • Integration of proxy and direct forces
  • Saturation of Israeli air defenses

Iran’s direct attack on Israel shattered decades of proxy warfare constraints and brought the two countries to the brink of full-scale military confrontation for the first time since 1979.

#Iran direct attack #Operation True Promise #Missile barrage #Direct confrontation