First Full National Assembly Elections Mark Democratic Milestone
First Full National Assembly Elections Mark Democratic Milestone
Taiwan achieved a major democratic milestone on December 21, 1991, with the first full elections for the National Assembly, effectively ending the fiction of representing all of China and establishing genuine representative democracy on the island.
Historic Transition
The elections replaced the “eternal” legislators who had been elected on the mainland in 1947 and claimed to represent constituencies now under Communist control. This transition:
- Ended 44 years of political fiction
- Established legitimacy based on Taiwan’s actual population
- Marked a decisive break from authoritarian governance
Electoral Results
The Kuomintang (KMT) maintained its dominance but faced real competition:
- KMT: 71% of seats (254 out of 325)
- Democratic Progressive Party (DPP): 24% of seats
- Other parties and independents: 5% of seats
While the KMT retained control, the emergence of a legitimate opposition marked a fundamental shift from one-party rule.
Campaign Dynamics
The campaign demonstrated Taiwan’s evolving democratic culture:
Open Political Debate
- Cross-strait relations openly discussed
- Constitutional reform proposals debated
- Media coverage relatively free
Identity Politics Emerge
- Taiwan independence vs. unification debate surfaces
- Ethnic tensions between mainlanders and native Taiwanese addressed
- Generational divides become apparent
Beijing’s Hostile Reaction
The PRC strongly condemned the elections:
- Declared them “illegal” and “invalid”
- Claimed they violated the “one China” principle
- Warned against any moves toward independence
Beijing’s authoritarian leadership viewed Taiwan’s democratization as a threat to their legitimacy and a potential inspiration for mainland dissidents.
International Observations
International observers praised the electoral process:
- Generally free and fair proceedings
- High voter turnout (over 70%)
- Peaceful transfer of legislative power
This contrasted sharply with the suppression of democracy movements in mainland China, particularly after Tiananmen Square in 1989.
Constitutional Reform Agenda
The new National Assembly faced critical tasks:
- Presidential Election Method - Deciding between direct and indirect election
- Provincial Government Status - Addressing Taiwan Province government redundancy
- Cross-Strait Relations Framework - Defining legal relationship with mainland
Democratization vs. Stability
The elections highlighted tensions between:
- Democratic Progress: Expanding political participation and representation
- Cross-Strait Stability: Avoiding actions that might provoke Beijing
- Economic Interests: Maintaining prosperity amid political change
Long-term Implications
These elections set important precedents:
- Established competitive multi-party democracy
- Created mechanisms for peaceful political change
- Strengthened Taiwan’s separate political identity
- Widened the political gap with authoritarian China
The successful National Assembly elections demonstrated that Chinese society could embrace and implement democratic governance, directly challenging Beijing’s claims that democracy was unsuitable for Chinese culture and providing a powerful counter-narrative to CCP authoritarian rule.